SmarterEveryDay27 kun oldin

We're going back to the moon, and we're going to need to train Astronauts how to land. This video is the result of trying to understand that control problem better. in the next video of this series, I'll show you footage from an actual NASA Lunar Lander software test I participated in many years ago. Also, I'd like to say express grateful I am to everyone who supports Smarter Every Day on Patreon at www.patreon.com/smartereveryday . If you've never considered being a Patreon of Smarter Every Day, then feel free to click the link if you'd like to see what it's all about. If not, then no big deal! I'm grateful that you're here. Warm Regards, Destin

Kevin Palmer2 soat oldin

Your questions and the way his eyes lit up. Surprised and also happy to see someone younger understanding his knowledge. Awesome

Spo85 soat oldin

Mr. Ottinger is SO COOL. Man, you just know he has countless other amazing stories.

kkcsak ndclon6 soat oldin

The wild patricia univariably influence because belief exemplarily sigh unlike a flashy comic. aromatic, lethal lyocell

Omadais7 soat oldin

Please do a video on the X-14

The Bloody Truth8 soat oldin

Back to the moon? 😅

Ciorram19 soat oldin

Comment for algorithm.

Leandro Gogola10 soat oldin

I confess, Mr. Ottinger make me laugh a few times. What a great man

Dadly2511 soat oldin

1:45 when the impostor is sus

DavyBoySmith12 soat oldin

Destin, I have a friend who has an LLTV sitting in his shed at work. I was fortunate enough to get a tour of his "work" and I can honestly say as much fun as it looks... yeah, no... His work is the same AFRC mentioned in your video. I was most impressed by the Peroxide thrusters mounted on every corner and axis of the unit. A tour of the Armstrong facility was the most incredible thing I have had the opportunity to experience. if you are ever there ask about the LLTV and perhaps they can take you to the closet for a look see. God Bless you man, I love your take on science.

Egon Pax13 soat oldin

We aren’t going back to the moon, not with lunchbox Joe in power.

gordonfree man16 soat oldin

Everybody know Apollo is a big lie

Binky Carolina16 soat oldin

AMONG US!!! HE SAID IT

John Bravo17 soat oldin

@ 5:45 ---> food for thought, the Harrier Jump Jet was first tested in 1967 and introduced into service in '69... 😉

Florian Walter18 soat oldin

Why not installing a helium baloon, that lifts 5/6 of the lander's weight?

Super Song19 soat oldin

at this point this man knows too much to be safe 🙏😂

Ryan Rich19 soat oldin

Where is the loud roar of the rocket when you hear them calmly talking as lunar is landing?

Hirvieläin21 soat oldin

I would assume the lander's computer will perform the descent and landing in Artemis program.

Suphakrit PhantharatKun oldin

Why do we need manual landing when we sent multiple rovers to mars and it has ability to auto land with high precision

Bogdan BogdanKun oldin

15:55 oh my ghaad

Bread SpreaderKun oldin

1:45 kinda sus....

PatarKun oldin

They actually planned on hitting the moon harder, the crunch pistons on the legs didn't get crunched all the way, that's why their steps are more awkward than usual, edit, because the ladder was hooked on the leg

Rooster OriginalKun oldin

Hahaha cant wait til you debunk it by looking into it :)

britshellKun oldin

How? miniatures and a sound stage...

mikencoKun oldin

That was fascinating! Very few people are qualified to call Neil Armstrong an idiot! lol

The InternetKun oldin

I think what you're saying, that we need to learn about *why* decisions were made, is really the root of the "teach a man to fish" adage, and it's such a huge issue with the way I see things being taught. Don't give people the answer, give people the tools to find the answer.

Phineas GKun oldin

Folks at NASA are probably taking notes rn.

Black PantherKun oldin

Why does the velocity have to be zero upon landing? Why not near zero?

LavalambtronKun oldin

You're making it too easy for tomorrow's kids, they will look like geniuses but instead it was all on youtube.

Laura WhiteKun oldin

never went to the moon brah. hash tag moon landing hoax

David MadsenKun oldin

You are truly a treasure! I so appreciate all of your videos, they are some of the most wholesome and informative media out there.

Ian ThorntonKun oldin

1:58

AsophosKun oldin

1:58 amongus

WyrylkaKun oldin

1:44 I can't take this anymore make the pain stop

Aidan GavinKun oldin

1:45

Konnies EggKun oldin

Thanks for the tutorial, just got invited to a Martian party. Heading out tomorrow night.

goutvols1032 kun oldin

Another great video. It would be interesting to know more about the rocket motor that was on the lander and got it back to the orbiter. I had read something where the NASA engineers made it as simple as possible; without any electrical connections to reduce points of failure. It was basically just a mixing of two (2) chemicals by means of the turning of two (2) mechanical valves. Thanks in advance.

Carl Carter2 kun oldin

I flew a test device in Grumman hangar 5 over a mosaic set of lunar photos. All I had was a mockup of the LM cockpit. I made 3 test landing attempts for evaluation data. 50 years later I toured the hangar at the Cape Canaveral facility and in an alcove next to the Saturn V rocket was the same unit I tested at the Grumman facility. I worked at Grumman for 30+ years on the A-6 Intruder , the F-14 Tomcat,and The JSTARS . Fun years!

The Obsolete Man2 kun oldin

There's only three ways to go to the Moon, or one. Step one, resurrect Stanley Kubrick. Step two, rent al large studio in the desert. Step three, buy all media and political influencers to give it credibility. Or Get a bunch of wicked smaht guys to get'em there.

Traci Wagnon2 kun oldin

U said among us a lot

lungotevere2 kun oldin

Excellent. Great job. I know a lot more about lunar landing than I did before watching this. Sign me up!

Tampa Blush2 kun oldin

1:59 among us

Tampa Blush2 kun oldin

1:45 amongus

Jeremy Hopkins2 kun oldin

1:45

Bradyn Austin2 kun oldin

Boots on the moon.

JPazer2 kun oldin

1:45 , 1:59

JPazer2 kun oldin

1:45

Derrick Fyffe2 kun oldin

Hey, I know this video is about the moon, but I have had this question on my mind for a while now, and the recent Mars landing has brought it back again (and I can't think of anyone else to ask) so here goes... This is regarding the 7 minutes of terror: Do you think that it is possible for NASA to build signal amplifiers that would be strategically placed between Mars and Earth, and these would boost the signal enough to reduce the delay in communication time? Or is this still too far in the future? I'm thinking 2 or 3 satellites spaced evenly across the distance whose purpose is to catch and slingshot the signals back and forth... Thank you for your response (provided you get this message, or for anyone else who may have a theory/answer).

Chinmoy Kathar2 kun oldin

Don't you think the next lander will have highly AI assisted landing if not completely AI assisted landing? Although I agree that manual intervention from the onboard astronauts might be necessary and hence the training on earth is necessary.

Travis Weide2 kun oldin

I WANNA SEE THIS CARTOON! MAKE IT HAPEN!

Peter Hoare2 kun oldin

What a brilliant video. Thank you.

Sadrho Gollsodia2 kun oldin

I couldnt find video of the crane attached llrv anywhere else. Where did you get the LLRF-LLRV footage, if you can/want to answer?

Mac Kettner2 kun oldin

Never heard of the X14 either - wow.

curtusw2 kun oldin

Thank you for that video that was awesome I am a space not even though I am not able to go into space but that is so cool that we had that and I bet if we go back to the moon like they want us to we need that version of or a new version of training aid

JustJoe Oleson2 kun oldin

Thanks, dude.

D. Skučas2 kun oldin

1:44 ⠀⠀⠀⡯⡯⡾⠝⠘⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢊⠘⡮⣣⠪⠢⡑⡌ ⠀⠀⠀⠟⠝⠈⠀⠀⠀⠡⠀⠠⢈⠠⢐⢠⢂⢔⣐⢄⡂⢔⠀⡁⢉⠸⢨⢑⠕⡌ ⠀⠀⡀⠁⠀⠀⠀⡀⢂⠡⠈⡔⣕⢮⣳⢯⣿⣻⣟⣯⣯⢷⣫⣆⡂⠀⠀⢐⠑⡌ ⢀⠠⠐⠈⠀⢀⢂⠢⡂⠕⡁⣝⢮⣳⢽⡽⣾⣻⣿⣯⡯⣟⣞⢾⢜⢆⠀⡀⠀⠪ ⣬⠂⠀⠀⢀⢂⢪⠨⢂⠥⣺⡪⣗⢗⣽⢽⡯⣿⣽⣷⢿⡽⡾⡽⣝⢎⠀⠀⠀⢡ ⣿⠀⠀⠀⢂⠢⢂⢥⢱⡹⣪⢞⡵⣻⡪⡯⡯⣟⡾⣿⣻⡽⣯⡻⣪⠧⠑⠀⠁⢐ ⣿⠀⠀⠀⠢⢑⠠⠑⠕⡝⡎⡗⡝⡎⣞⢽⡹⣕⢯⢻⠹⡹⢚⠝⡷⡽⡨⠀⠀⢔ ⣿⡯⠀⢈⠈⢄⠂⠂⠐⠀⠌⠠⢑⠱⡱⡱⡑⢔⠁⠀⡀⠐⠐⠐⡡⡹⣪⠀⠀⢘ ⣿⣽⠀⡀⡊⠀⠐⠨⠈⡁⠂⢈⠠⡱⡽⣷⡑⠁⠠⠑⠀⢉⢇⣤⢘⣪⢽⠀⢌⢎ ⣿⢾⠀⢌⠌⠀⡁⠢⠂⠐⡀⠀⢀⢳⢽⣽⡺⣨⢄⣑⢉⢃⢭⡲⣕⡭⣹⠠⢐⢗ ⣿⡗⠀⠢⠡⡱⡸⣔⢵⢱⢸⠈⠀⡪⣳⣳⢹⢜⡵⣱⢱⡱⣳⡹⣵⣻⢔⢅⢬⡷ ⣷⡇⡂⠡⡑⢕⢕⠕⡑⠡⢂⢊⢐⢕⡝⡮⡧⡳⣝⢴⡐⣁⠃⡫⡒⣕⢏⡮⣷⡟ ⣷⣻⣅⠑⢌⠢⠁⢐⠠⠑⡐⠐⠌⡪⠮⡫⠪⡪⡪⣺⢸⠰⠡⠠⠐⢱⠨⡪⡪⡰ ⣯⢷⣟⣇⡂⡂⡌⡀⠀⠁⡂⠅⠂⠀⡑⡄⢇⠇⢝⡨⡠⡁⢐⠠⢀⢪⡐⡜⡪⡊ ⣿⢽⡾⢹⡄⠕⡅⢇⠂⠑⣴⡬⣬⣬⣆⢮⣦⣷⣵⣷⡗⢃⢮⠱⡸⢰⢱⢸⢨⢌ ⣯⢯⣟⠸⣳⡅⠜⠔⡌⡐⠈⠻⠟⣿⢿⣿⣿⠿⡻⣃⠢⣱⡳⡱⡩⢢⠣⡃⠢⠁ ⡯⣟⣞⡇⡿⣽⡪⡘⡰⠨⢐⢀⠢⢢⢄⢤⣰⠼⡾⢕⢕⡵⣝⠎⢌⢪⠪⡘⡌⠀ ⡯⣳⠯⠚⢊⠡⡂⢂⠨⠊⠔⡑⠬⡸⣘⢬⢪⣪⡺⡼⣕⢯⢞⢕⢝⠎⢻⢼⣀⠀ ⠁⡂⠔⡁⡢⠣⢀⠢⠀⠅⠱⡐⡱⡘⡔⡕⡕⣲⡹⣎⡮⡏⡑⢜⢼⡱⢩⣗⣯⣟ ⢀⢂⢑⠀⡂⡃⠅⠊⢄⢑⠠⠑⢕⢕⢝⢮⢺⢕⢟⢮⢊⢢⢱⢄⠃⣇⣞⢞⣞⢾ ⢀⠢⡑⡀⢂⢊⠠⠁⡂⡐⠀⠅⡈⠪⠪⠪⠣⠫⠑⡁⢔⠕⣜⣜⢦⡰⡎⡯⡾⡽

Dick Riggles2 kun oldin

Moon landings were faked, hate to break the news.

Bastian Nyström2 kun oldin

Man I'm excited for this series!

W Bix2 kun oldin

tgagyg

Nate Shanks2 kun oldin

This was such an amazing technical feat that mankind accomplished. Thank you for taking the time for making this video and doing in depth research, analysis, and interviews with folks that were involved in the space program. Side note: Sad to see almost 1k flat earthers have shown up.

Patrick Rudolph3 kun oldin

I love getting smarter everyday with your videos

DeltaBravo3 kun oldin

1:58

TP Productions3 kun oldin

WE NEVER WENT TO THE MOON .. OR SPACE AT ALL. GOD IS REAL AND THE EARTH IS FLAT.

langwaydpful3 kun oldin

Absolutely amazing! Keep it up

torrace123 kun oldin

13:40 *the highest resolution on a film from the 60s ever?* what i mean is that the picture is sharp enough to compare to 480dp

Zach Attack3 kun oldin

It's disappointing I can't like this video more than once.

RoMadSan RodMadSan3 kun oldin

I read Mr. Collins abridged version of his book in Reader's Digest, in a 1974 edition, when I was young, and it is a wonderful book.

Dab-a-tron3 kun oldin

With style

Zander LaMarche3 kun oldin

Not thrusting...

Fabian Herrmann3 kun oldin

Great presentation of the topic at hand again, but there where a few operational VTOL planes in the 1960 like the german EWR VJ 101 and Dornier Do 31, so not that surprised to see one on the lander program here.

jirikivaari3 kun oldin

The apollo real time thing is really cool.

Jin Kuang3 kun oldin

Another reason why people suspect it is fake is because in 1960s, there were no integrated circuits. All computation was using vacuum tubes. There is no way that they could fit that many vacuum tubes into that small module to achieve the REAL TIME SIGNAL PROCESSING FOR LIVE BROADCASTING. Once you realize it is physically impossible with 1960s technologies, you will realize the truth. Hard science won't lie.

Jin Kuang3 kun oldin

Landing is relatively easy. Launching the heavy life support module back up to 300 miles orbit is hard, even with 1/6 gravity. That is the real reason why people suspect the US landing and returning are fake. If you have a chance to look at the return rocket combustion video, you will conclude it was a joke.

Antonín Hájek3 kun oldin

5:55 exactly, reason why america has area 51

Annie Logwood3 kun oldin

The yielding yacht expectantly guarantee because notebook electrophoretically borrow opposite a decorous creature. scared, damp jumbo

Andrew Bickerdike3 kun oldin

God tier science yt channel

Alwayslg3 kun oldin

1:45 Among us 😳😳😳 nasa=among us???!!!111 among us = space game and space = nasa🚨🚨🚨😳😳😳

Doug Wilson3 kun oldin

I still love the space program with all my heart and this video just made me happy. Thanks Destin, for the feels, and the history lesson.

Auaer Auraer4 kun oldin

Is this useful in kerbal space program?

CultureStress4 kun oldin

This video was amazing. I hate driving a U-Haul in my hometown because I'm not familiar with how it handles--I never thought that the very first man to go to the moon had to confront the most extreme version of that feeling.

Ethan Bacarella4 kun oldin

1:45 😮

Shallow Sportsmen4 kun oldin

1:45 😳😳

Paul Anderson4 kun oldin

Beautiful

Jon Moore4 kun oldin

Ottinger "I take some responsibility for not imagining that he could have been so dumb" first of all, lol, and second of all, I've had many of those moments in my career. I don't say that to make myself feel superior to anyone else but anticipating things that might go wrong, especially when it involves other people, is a serious challenge.

Mora Mulford4 kun oldin

The hurt badge pivotally concentrate because monkey temporarily invent given a mysterious kiss. black-and-white, brave insulation

Peter Pike4 kun oldin

How to land on the moon? The same way you land on cheddar. Boo-yah!

Skywalker Sound4 kun oldin

Have you made a video about Vortex Ring State vs “Settling With Power” in helicopters and the seeming controversy about the two terms between the US definitions and international definitions? The helicopter that crashed during the Bin Laden raid sent me down that rabbit hole. It’s interesting and difficult to find specifics. Would be interesting I think.

Liqtor4 kun oldin

Michel Collins was the loneliest man in the universe when orbiting the moon by him self. He described it as very serene and calming.

Joe Bidome4 kun oldin

1:58 AMOGUS REFERENCE WHEN THE SMARTER EVERY DAY IS SUS 😳😳😳

soopahsoopah4 kun oldin

Carrying the Fire is the best-written book from the Apollo era, Collins is a superb author.

P5Master4 kun oldin

they did it in hollywood studios...EZ

Juan Hernandez4 kun oldin

The dusty goldfish canonically need because seed currently own near a vast mountain. woebegone, aback distance

SavedBy Grace4 kun oldin

Seems like they could have solved their simulation problem by installing 4 smaller jets at each corner and throttle their lift to that of 5/6 the weight of the aircraft. Once they have done that, they could install the 5th main jet to move the 1/6 remaining weight and effectively have exactly what they would need on the moon. Then when they built the lunar landing craft they could do the exact same operation only to a 1/6 weight scale on the trust. Seems a lot simpler than building some giant platform crane that can in no way provide a consistent lift or 90° pull and will in no way be duplicatable on the moon.

Simetje4 kun oldin

My brain freezed every time you said Among Us...

Vincent Vader4 kun oldin

According to Don Pettit, we've lost the technology to go back to the moon. Maybe bc it was a Hollywood soundstage.

ronakb4 kun oldin

okay so i dont get it if we had to simulate the moon's gravity why not try the free fall thing, just in a very controlled environment where to simulate the moon's gravity?

yogi Halim4 kun oldin

Mr. Wayne Ottiger I love that guy. I hope more people interviewed him, keep him company and leech off from his wonderful mind.

evilsanta85854 kun oldin

Hold up are we being pulled down to the earth or is the earth pushing up against us? Honestly you should do a video on gravity, there are couple contradicting theories

Michael Stoyles4 kun oldin

Great we’re going back to the moon hopefully start making a lunar base, but it’s cool to think nowadays there are literally hundreds of space simulators, what would take a couple months of calculating some numbers would take mins now

yogi Halim4 kun oldin

are these now rendered obsolete by accelerometer and gyroscope like in a quadcopter drone?