HOW TO LAND ON THE MOON - Smarter Every Day 250

Get 1st Audiobook + full access to the Plus Catalog for free when you try Audible for 30 days www.audible.com/smarter or TXT smarter to 500500
Click here if you're interested in subscribing: bit.ly/Subscribe2SED
⇊ Click below for more links! ⇊
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
GET SMARTER SECTION
A very special thank you to Wayne Ottinger
www.aletro.org/
Check out the AMAZING website by Ben Feist that synchronizes all Apollo data:
www.apolloinrealtime.org/
I had to find a lot of archival footage to make this video. Thanks to Devin for helping me find the original Apollo LLTV footage from Ellington.
A special thank you to steveslater1987 for providing the footage and audio of the Neil Armstrong Interview after flying the LLTV.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tweet Ideas to me at:
smartereveryday
Smarter Every Day on Facebook
SmarterEveryDay
Smarter Every Day on Patreon
www.patreon.com/smartereveryday
Smarter Every Day On Instagram
smartereveryday
Smarter Every Day SubReddit
www.reddit.com/r/smartereveryday
Ambiance, audio and musicy things by: Gordon McGladdery
www.ashellinthepit.com/
ashellinthepit.bandcamp.com/
If you feel like this video was worth your time and added value to your life, please SHARE THE VIDEO!
If you REALLY liked it, feel free to pitch a few dollars Smarter Every Day by becoming a Patron.
www.patreon.com/smartereveryday
Warm Regards,
Destin

Fikrlar

  1. SmarterEveryDay

    SmarterEveryDay27 kun oldin

    We're going back to the moon, and we're going to need to train Astronauts how to land. This video is the result of trying to understand that control problem better. in the next video of this series, I'll show you footage from an actual NASA Lunar Lander software test I participated in many years ago. Also, I'd like to say express grateful I am to everyone who supports Smarter Every Day on Patreon at www.patreon.com/smartereveryday . If you've never considered being a Patreon of Smarter Every Day, then feel free to click the link if you'd like to see what it's all about. If not, then no big deal! I'm grateful that you're here. Warm Regards, Destin

  2. Almaadin

    AlmaadinKun oldin

    @MaGaO true, but the software to land reliably is fairly new and getting better all the time. Most of the failed Mars landings happened without the benefit of the sensors and algorithms available now. It's still best to train the pilots of course.

  3. MaGaO

    MaGaOKun oldin

    @Almaadin Many Mars probes have crashed. If humans are aboard, it makes sense to train them just in case.

  4. hernan jimenez

    hernan jimenezKun oldin

    @Almaadin that was done on earth..so gullible lol. Mars supposedly is 1% density of earth atmosphere. which means no air. an you need air to slow parachute and need air for lift when they eventually fly helicopter drone. so the impossible without air debunks your Mars landing 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣🤣😭😭😭😭😂🤣🤣🤣🤣😂😭😭

  5. Almaadin

    Almaadin2 kun oldin

    I disagree with your thesis statement. After watching perseverance land itself, I think we could definitely automate landing on the moon. It is probably still a good idea to train astronauts to land on the moon but I don't think we HAVE to.

  6. That Scar

    That Scar3 kun oldin

    Where is the helicopter video? No links?

  7. Kevin Palmer

    Kevin Palmer2 soat oldin

    Your questions and the way his eyes lit up. Surprised and also happy to see someone younger understanding his knowledge. Awesome

  8. Spo8

    Spo85 soat oldin

    Mr. Ottinger is SO COOL. Man, you just know he has countless other amazing stories.

  9. kkcsak ndclon

    kkcsak ndclon6 soat oldin

    The wild patricia univariably influence because belief exemplarily sigh unlike a flashy comic. aromatic, lethal lyocell

  10. Omadais

    Omadais7 soat oldin

    Please do a video on the X-14

  11. The Bloody Truth

    The Bloody Truth8 soat oldin

    Back to the moon? 😅

  12. Ciorram1

    Ciorram19 soat oldin

    Comment for algorithm.

  13. Leandro Gogola

    Leandro Gogola10 soat oldin

    I confess, Mr. Ottinger make me laugh a few times. What a great man

  14. Dadly25

    Dadly2511 soat oldin

    1:45 when the impostor is sus

  15. DavyBoySmith

    DavyBoySmith12 soat oldin

    Destin, I have a friend who has an LLTV sitting in his shed at work. I was fortunate enough to get a tour of his "work" and I can honestly say as much fun as it looks... yeah, no... His work is the same AFRC mentioned in your video. I was most impressed by the Peroxide thrusters mounted on every corner and axis of the unit. A tour of the Armstrong facility was the most incredible thing I have had the opportunity to experience. if you are ever there ask about the LLTV and perhaps they can take you to the closet for a look see. God Bless you man, I love your take on science.

  16. Egon Pax

    Egon Pax13 soat oldin

    We aren’t going back to the moon, not with lunchbox Joe in power.

  17. gordonfree man

    gordonfree man16 soat oldin

    Everybody know Apollo is a big lie

  18. Atlas

    Atlas8 soat oldin

    Wrong

  19. Binky Carolina

    Binky Carolina16 soat oldin

    AMONG US!!! HE SAID IT

  20. John Bravo

    John Bravo17 soat oldin

    @ 5:45 ---> food for thought, the Harrier Jump Jet was first tested in 1967 and introduced into service in '69... 😉

  21. Florian Walter

    Florian Walter18 soat oldin

    Why not installing a helium baloon, that lifts 5/6 of the lander's weight?

  22. Super Song

    Super Song19 soat oldin

    at this point this man knows too much to be safe 🙏😂

  23. Ryan Rich

    Ryan Rich19 soat oldin

    Where is the loud roar of the rocket when you hear them calmly talking as lunar is landing?

  24. Ryan Rich

    Ryan Rich15 soat oldin

    @Atlas nms was tight

  25. Atlas

    Atlas15 soat oldin

    It's a pressure fed engine firing in a vacuum, come on.

  26. Hirvieläin

    Hirvieläin21 soat oldin

    I would assume the lander's computer will perform the descent and landing in Artemis program.

  27. Suphakrit Phantharat

    Suphakrit PhantharatKun oldin

    Why do we need manual landing when we sent multiple rovers to mars and it has ability to auto land with high precision

  28. Bogdan Bogdan

    Bogdan BogdanKun oldin

    15:55 oh my ghaad

  29. Bread Spreader

    Bread SpreaderKun oldin

    1:45 kinda sus....

  30. Patar

    PatarKun oldin

    They actually planned on hitting the moon harder, the crunch pistons on the legs didn't get crunched all the way, that's why their steps are more awkward than usual, edit, because the ladder was hooked on the leg

  31. Rooster Original

    Rooster OriginalKun oldin

    Hahaha cant wait til you debunk it by looking into it :)

  32. Atlas

    Atlas15 soat oldin

    There's nothing to debunk.

  33. britshell

    britshellKun oldin

    How? miniatures and a sound stage...

  34. mikenco

    mikencoKun oldin

    That was fascinating! Very few people are qualified to call Neil Armstrong an idiot! lol

  35. The Internet

    The InternetKun oldin

    I think what you're saying, that we need to learn about *why* decisions were made, is really the root of the "teach a man to fish" adage, and it's such a huge issue with the way I see things being taught. Don't give people the answer, give people the tools to find the answer.

  36. Phineas G

    Phineas GKun oldin

    Folks at NASA are probably taking notes rn.

  37. Black Panther

    Black PantherKun oldin

    Why does the velocity have to be zero upon landing? Why not near zero?

  38. Lavalambtron

    LavalambtronKun oldin

    You're making it too easy for tomorrow's kids, they will look like geniuses but instead it was all on youtube.

  39. Some Ones

    Some Ones16 soat oldin

    The power of technology.

  40. Laura White

    Laura WhiteKun oldin

    never went to the moon brah. hash tag moon landing hoax

  41. Atlas

    AtlasKun oldin

    @Laura White I have better things to do than watch conspiracy videos. That said, I never came across a good hoaxer argument.

  42. Laura White

    Laura WhiteKun oldin

    Atlas gee what a convincing retort Atlas. See “American Moon” on YT and then try to tell me it’s not possible that something’s up with the official narrative.

  43. Atlas

    AtlasKun oldin

    wrong

  44. David Madsen

    David MadsenKun oldin

    You are truly a treasure! I so appreciate all of your videos, they are some of the most wholesome and informative media out there.

  45. Ian Thornton

    Ian ThorntonKun oldin

    1:58

  46. Asophos

    AsophosKun oldin

    1:58 amongus

  47. Some Ones

    Some Ones16 soat oldin

    😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳

  48. Wyrylka

    WyrylkaKun oldin

    1:44 I can't take this anymore make the pain stop

  49. Bears

    Bears5 soat oldin

    Kinda sus

  50. Aidan Gavin

    Aidan GavinKun oldin

    1:45

  51. Konnies Egg

    Konnies EggKun oldin

    Thanks for the tutorial, just got invited to a Martian party. Heading out tomorrow night.

  52. goutvols103

    goutvols1032 kun oldin

    Another great video. It would be interesting to know more about the rocket motor that was on the lander and got it back to the orbiter. I had read something where the NASA engineers made it as simple as possible; without any electrical connections to reduce points of failure. It was basically just a mixing of two (2) chemicals by means of the turning of two (2) mechanical valves. Thanks in advance.

  53. Carl Carter

    Carl Carter2 kun oldin

    I flew a test device in Grumman hangar 5 over a mosaic set of lunar photos. All I had was a mockup of the LM cockpit. I made 3 test landing attempts for evaluation data. 50 years later I toured the hangar at the Cape Canaveral facility and in an alcove next to the Saturn V rocket was the same unit I tested at the Grumman facility. I worked at Grumman for 30+ years on the A-6 Intruder , the F-14 Tomcat,and The JSTARS . Fun years!

  54. The Obsolete Man

    The Obsolete Man2 kun oldin

    There's only three ways to go to the Moon, or one. Step one, resurrect Stanley Kubrick. Step two, rent al large studio in the desert. Step three, buy all media and political influencers to give it credibility. Or Get a bunch of wicked smaht guys to get'em there.

  55. Traci Wagnon

    Traci Wagnon2 kun oldin

    U said among us a lot

  56. lungotevere

    lungotevere2 kun oldin

    Excellent. Great job. I know a lot more about lunar landing than I did before watching this. Sign me up!

  57. Tampa Blush

    Tampa Blush2 kun oldin

    1:59 among us

  58. Tampa Blush

    Tampa Blush2 kun oldin

    1:45 amongus

  59. Jeremy Hopkins

    Jeremy Hopkins2 kun oldin

    1:45

  60. Bradyn Austin

    Bradyn Austin2 kun oldin

    Boots on the moon.

  61. JPazer

    JPazer2 kun oldin

    1:45 , 1:59

  62. JPazer

    JPazer2 kun oldin

    1:45

  63. Derrick Fyffe

    Derrick Fyffe2 kun oldin

    Hey, I know this video is about the moon, but I have had this question on my mind for a while now, and the recent Mars landing has brought it back again (and I can't think of anyone else to ask) so here goes... This is regarding the 7 minutes of terror: Do you think that it is possible for NASA to build signal amplifiers that would be strategically placed between Mars and Earth, and these would boost the signal enough to reduce the delay in communication time? Or is this still too far in the future? I'm thinking 2 or 3 satellites spaced evenly across the distance whose purpose is to catch and slingshot the signals back and forth... Thank you for your response (provided you get this message, or for anyone else who may have a theory/answer).

  64. Atlas

    AtlasKun oldin

    The delay is because of the finite speed of light. There's nothing that can be done about that.

  65. Chinmoy Kathar

    Chinmoy Kathar2 kun oldin

    Don't you think the next lander will have highly AI assisted landing if not completely AI assisted landing? Although I agree that manual intervention from the onboard astronauts might be necessary and hence the training on earth is necessary.

  66. Travis Weide

    Travis Weide2 kun oldin

    I WANNA SEE THIS CARTOON! MAKE IT HAPEN!

  67. Peter Hoare

    Peter Hoare2 kun oldin

    What a brilliant video. Thank you.

  68. Sadrho Gollsodia

    Sadrho Gollsodia2 kun oldin

    I couldnt find video of the crane attached llrv anywhere else. Where did you get the LLRF-LLRV footage, if you can/want to answer?

  69. Mac Kettner

    Mac Kettner2 kun oldin

    Never heard of the X14 either - wow.

  70. curtusw

    curtusw2 kun oldin

    Thank you for that video that was awesome I am a space not even though I am not able to go into space but that is so cool that we had that and I bet if we go back to the moon like they want us to we need that version of or a new version of training aid

  71. JustJoe Oleson

    JustJoe Oleson2 kun oldin

    Thanks, dude.

  72. D. Skučas

    D. Skučas2 kun oldin

    1:44 ⠀⠀⠀⡯⡯⡾⠝⠘⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢊⠘⡮⣣⠪⠢⡑⡌ ⠀⠀⠀⠟⠝⠈⠀⠀⠀⠡⠀⠠⢈⠠⢐⢠⢂⢔⣐⢄⡂⢔⠀⡁⢉⠸⢨⢑⠕⡌ ⠀⠀⡀⠁⠀⠀⠀⡀⢂⠡⠈⡔⣕⢮⣳⢯⣿⣻⣟⣯⣯⢷⣫⣆⡂⠀⠀⢐⠑⡌ ⢀⠠⠐⠈⠀⢀⢂⠢⡂⠕⡁⣝⢮⣳⢽⡽⣾⣻⣿⣯⡯⣟⣞⢾⢜⢆⠀⡀⠀⠪ ⣬⠂⠀⠀⢀⢂⢪⠨⢂⠥⣺⡪⣗⢗⣽⢽⡯⣿⣽⣷⢿⡽⡾⡽⣝⢎⠀⠀⠀⢡ ⣿⠀⠀⠀⢂⠢⢂⢥⢱⡹⣪⢞⡵⣻⡪⡯⡯⣟⡾⣿⣻⡽⣯⡻⣪⠧⠑⠀⠁⢐ ⣿⠀⠀⠀⠢⢑⠠⠑⠕⡝⡎⡗⡝⡎⣞⢽⡹⣕⢯⢻⠹⡹⢚⠝⡷⡽⡨⠀⠀⢔ ⣿⡯⠀⢈⠈⢄⠂⠂⠐⠀⠌⠠⢑⠱⡱⡱⡑⢔⠁⠀⡀⠐⠐⠐⡡⡹⣪⠀⠀⢘ ⣿⣽⠀⡀⡊⠀⠐⠨⠈⡁⠂⢈⠠⡱⡽⣷⡑⠁⠠⠑⠀⢉⢇⣤⢘⣪⢽⠀⢌⢎ ⣿⢾⠀⢌⠌⠀⡁⠢⠂⠐⡀⠀⢀⢳⢽⣽⡺⣨⢄⣑⢉⢃⢭⡲⣕⡭⣹⠠⢐⢗ ⣿⡗⠀⠢⠡⡱⡸⣔⢵⢱⢸⠈⠀⡪⣳⣳⢹⢜⡵⣱⢱⡱⣳⡹⣵⣻⢔⢅⢬⡷ ⣷⡇⡂⠡⡑⢕⢕⠕⡑⠡⢂⢊⢐⢕⡝⡮⡧⡳⣝⢴⡐⣁⠃⡫⡒⣕⢏⡮⣷⡟ ⣷⣻⣅⠑⢌⠢⠁⢐⠠⠑⡐⠐⠌⡪⠮⡫⠪⡪⡪⣺⢸⠰⠡⠠⠐⢱⠨⡪⡪⡰ ⣯⢷⣟⣇⡂⡂⡌⡀⠀⠁⡂⠅⠂⠀⡑⡄⢇⠇⢝⡨⡠⡁⢐⠠⢀⢪⡐⡜⡪⡊ ⣿⢽⡾⢹⡄⠕⡅⢇⠂⠑⣴⡬⣬⣬⣆⢮⣦⣷⣵⣷⡗⢃⢮⠱⡸⢰⢱⢸⢨⢌ ⣯⢯⣟⠸⣳⡅⠜⠔⡌⡐⠈⠻⠟⣿⢿⣿⣿⠿⡻⣃⠢⣱⡳⡱⡩⢢⠣⡃⠢⠁ ⡯⣟⣞⡇⡿⣽⡪⡘⡰⠨⢐⢀⠢⢢⢄⢤⣰⠼⡾⢕⢕⡵⣝⠎⢌⢪⠪⡘⡌⠀ ⡯⣳⠯⠚⢊⠡⡂⢂⠨⠊⠔⡑⠬⡸⣘⢬⢪⣪⡺⡼⣕⢯⢞⢕⢝⠎⢻⢼⣀⠀ ⠁⡂⠔⡁⡢⠣⢀⠢⠀⠅⠱⡐⡱⡘⡔⡕⡕⣲⡹⣎⡮⡏⡑⢜⢼⡱⢩⣗⣯⣟ ⢀⢂⢑⠀⡂⡃⠅⠊⢄⢑⠠⠑⢕⢕⢝⢮⢺⢕⢟⢮⢊⢢⢱⢄⠃⣇⣞⢞⣞⢾ ⢀⠢⡑⡀⢂⢊⠠⠁⡂⡐⠀⠅⡈⠪⠪⠪⠣⠫⠑⡁⢔⠕⣜⣜⢦⡰⡎⡯⡾⡽

  73. Atlas

    Atlas2 kun oldin

    spooky

  74. Dick Riggles

    Dick Riggles2 kun oldin

    Moon landings were faked, hate to break the news.

  75. Brad Wooldidge

    Brad Wooldidge2 kun oldin

    Ha! You’re an ignorant moron. You know NOTHING about the engineering involved.

  76. Kyle Laurent

    Kyle Laurent2 kun oldin

    Hate to break it to you but you are an idiot.

  77. Dick Riggles

    Dick Riggles2 kun oldin

    @Atlas Seriously, do some thinking and use logic...

  78. Atlas

    Atlas2 kun oldin

    Wrong.

  79. Bastian Nyström

    Bastian Nyström2 kun oldin

    Man I'm excited for this series!

  80. W Bix

    W Bix2 kun oldin

    tgagyg

  81. Nate Shanks

    Nate Shanks2 kun oldin

    This was such an amazing technical feat that mankind accomplished. Thank you for taking the time for making this video and doing in depth research, analysis, and interviews with folks that were involved in the space program. Side note: Sad to see almost 1k flat earthers have shown up.

  82. Patrick Rudolph

    Patrick Rudolph3 kun oldin

    I love getting smarter everyday with your videos

  83. DeltaBravo

    DeltaBravo3 kun oldin

    1:58

  84. TP Productions

    TP Productions3 kun oldin

    WE NEVER WENT TO THE MOON .. OR SPACE AT ALL. GOD IS REAL AND THE EARTH IS FLAT.

  85. Some Ones

    Some Ones16 soat oldin

    Troller alert :|

  86. Brad Wooldidge

    Brad Wooldidge2 kun oldin

    Troll.

  87. Skippy

    Skippy2 kun oldin

    fool spotted

  88. Kyle Laurent

    Kyle Laurent2 kun oldin

    ****IDIOT ALERT****

  89. langwaydpful

    langwaydpful3 kun oldin

    Absolutely amazing! Keep it up

  90. torrace12

    torrace123 kun oldin

    13:40 *the highest resolution on a film from the 60s ever?* what i mean is that the picture is sharp enough to compare to 480dp

  91. Zach Attack

    Zach Attack3 kun oldin

    It's disappointing I can't like this video more than once.

  92. RoMadSan RodMadSan

    RoMadSan RodMadSan3 kun oldin

    I read Mr. Collins abridged version of his book in Reader's Digest, in a 1974 edition, when I was young, and it is a wonderful book.

  93. Dab-a-tron

    Dab-a-tron3 kun oldin

    With style

  94. Zander LaMarche

    Zander LaMarche3 kun oldin

    Not thrusting...

  95. Fabian Herrmann

    Fabian Herrmann3 kun oldin

    Great presentation of the topic at hand again, but there where a few operational VTOL planes in the 1960 like the german EWR VJ 101 and Dornier Do 31, so not that surprised to see one on the lander program here.

  96. jirikivaari

    jirikivaari3 kun oldin

    The apollo real time thing is really cool.

  97. Jin Kuang

    Jin Kuang3 kun oldin

    Another reason why people suspect it is fake is because in 1960s, there were no integrated circuits. All computation was using vacuum tubes. There is no way that they could fit that many vacuum tubes into that small module to achieve the REAL TIME SIGNAL PROCESSING FOR LIVE BROADCASTING. Once you realize it is physically impossible with 1960s technologies, you will realize the truth. Hard science won't lie.

  98. Atlas

    Atlas2 kun oldin

    @Jin Kuang Noise filtering would have been done at the ground stations. You know, the facilities with godzilla-sized satellite dishes.

  99. Jin Kuang

    Jin Kuang2 kun oldin

    @Kyle Laurent I know what I am talking about. This is just a small set of technical issues that are impossible to address in 1960s technologies.

  100. Jin Kuang

    Jin Kuang2 kun oldin

    @Atlas You have no idea what you are talking about. Noise filtering is a main operation for real time signal processing. Back in the 1960s there is a big room in TV station doing it. In fact, not until 80s do we start having broadcasting vehicles small enough to fit into a van. And that is 1980s. Think about what is in 1960s when you need to fit a life supporting system AND a broadcasting system into that landing module.

  101. Kyle Laurent

    Kyle Laurent2 kun oldin

    You have no idea what you are talking about.

  102. Atlas

    Atlas2 kun oldin

    Of course there were integrated circuits back then, lol. And they didn't need to do any digital processing. It's just live TV. Live TV has been a thing since the early 1900.

  103. Jin Kuang

    Jin Kuang3 kun oldin

    Landing is relatively easy. Launching the heavy life support module back up to 300 miles orbit is hard, even with 1/6 gravity. That is the real reason why people suspect the US landing and returning are fake. If you have a chance to look at the return rocket combustion video, you will conclude it was a joke.

  104. Atlas

    AtlasKun oldin

    @Jin Kuang Just do the calculations yourself, if you really care that much. Blueprints are freely available to the public. I have no idea what you mean by 'technology data'.

  105. Jin Kuang

    Jin KuangKun oldin

    Do you know why so much evidence were destroyed due to "negligence"? These evidence should be the most valuable technology data and blue prints for humanity. But no ... they were accidentally destroyed. Now we can not go back to the moon! Fundamental contradiction on how technology progress. How US suddenly get to land on the moon on the first try (very disruptive in technology progressing) and how suddenly it simply disappear (very disruptive in technology progressing).

  106. Jin Kuang

    Jin KuangKun oldin

    @Atlas I have not seen one single video or documentation on the combustion fuel needed to propel this ascending module (life supporting) back to 300 miles high up in orbit. The only video I saw was that laughable shot from the "moon surface" video on the combustion capture.

  107. Atlas

    AtlasKun oldin

    @Jin Kuang Rocket science doesn't work like that.

  108. Jin Kuang

    Jin KuangKun oldin

    @Atlas So it is an equivalent of 1 ton weight on earth. Shoot that up 300 miles and how much combustion material is needed?

  109. Antonín Hájek

    Antonín Hájek3 kun oldin

    5:55 exactly, reason why america has area 51

  110. Annie Logwood

    Annie Logwood3 kun oldin

    The yielding yacht expectantly guarantee because notebook electrophoretically borrow opposite a decorous creature. scared, damp jumbo

  111. Andrew Bickerdike

    Andrew Bickerdike3 kun oldin

    God tier science yt channel

  112. Alwayslg

    Alwayslg3 kun oldin

    1:45 Among us 😳😳😳 nasa=among us???!!!111 among us = space game and space = nasa🚨🚨🚨😳😳😳

  113. Some Ones

    Some Ones16 soat oldin

    omg when amongus nasa😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳

  114. Doug Wilson

    Doug Wilson3 kun oldin

    I still love the space program with all my heart and this video just made me happy. Thanks Destin, for the feels, and the history lesson.

  115. Auaer Auraer

    Auaer Auraer4 kun oldin

    Is this useful in kerbal space program?

  116. CultureStress

    CultureStress4 kun oldin

    This video was amazing. I hate driving a U-Haul in my hometown because I'm not familiar with how it handles--I never thought that the very first man to go to the moon had to confront the most extreme version of that feeling.

  117. Ethan Bacarella

    Ethan Bacarella4 kun oldin

    1:45 😮

  118. Shallow Sportsmen

    Shallow Sportsmen4 kun oldin

    1:45 😳😳

  119. Paul Anderson

    Paul Anderson4 kun oldin

    Beautiful

  120. Jon Moore

    Jon Moore4 kun oldin

    Ottinger "I take some responsibility for not imagining that he could have been so dumb" first of all, lol, and second of all, I've had many of those moments in my career. I don't say that to make myself feel superior to anyone else but anticipating things that might go wrong, especially when it involves other people, is a serious challenge.

  121. Mora Mulford

    Mora Mulford4 kun oldin

    The hurt badge pivotally concentrate because monkey temporarily invent given a mysterious kiss. black-and-white, brave insulation

  122. Peter Pike

    Peter Pike4 kun oldin

    How to land on the moon? The same way you land on cheddar. Boo-yah!

  123. Skywalker Sound

    Skywalker Sound4 kun oldin

    Have you made a video about Vortex Ring State vs “Settling With Power” in helicopters and the seeming controversy about the two terms between the US definitions and international definitions? The helicopter that crashed during the Bin Laden raid sent me down that rabbit hole. It’s interesting and difficult to find specifics. Would be interesting I think.

  124. Liqtor

    Liqtor4 kun oldin

    Michel Collins was the loneliest man in the universe when orbiting the moon by him self. He described it as very serene and calming.

  125. Joe Bidome

    Joe Bidome4 kun oldin

    1:58 AMOGUS REFERENCE WHEN THE SMARTER EVERY DAY IS SUS 😳😳😳

  126. Joe Bidome

    Joe Bidome2 kun oldin

    @Jeremy Hopkins no u

  127. Jeremy Hopkins

    Jeremy Hopkins2 kun oldin

    1:45

  128. Quinn

    Quinn3 kun oldin

    RAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

  129. soopahsoopah

    soopahsoopah4 kun oldin

    Carrying the Fire is the best-written book from the Apollo era, Collins is a superb author.

  130. P5Master

    P5Master4 kun oldin

    they did it in hollywood studios...EZ

  131. Some Ones

    Some Ones16 soat oldin

    troller

  132. Brad Wooldidge

    Brad Wooldidge2 kun oldin

    Did you even *watch* the video, moron?

  133. Juan Hernandez

    Juan Hernandez4 kun oldin

    The dusty goldfish canonically need because seed currently own near a vast mountain. woebegone, aback distance

  134. SavedBy Grace

    SavedBy Grace4 kun oldin

    Seems like they could have solved their simulation problem by installing 4 smaller jets at each corner and throttle their lift to that of 5/6 the weight of the aircraft. Once they have done that, they could install the 5th main jet to move the 1/6 remaining weight and effectively have exactly what they would need on the moon. Then when they built the lunar landing craft they could do the exact same operation only to a 1/6 weight scale on the trust. Seems a lot simpler than building some giant platform crane that can in no way provide a consistent lift or 90° pull and will in no way be duplicatable on the moon.

  135. Simetje

    Simetje4 kun oldin

    My brain freezed every time you said Among Us...

  136. Vincent Vader

    Vincent Vader4 kun oldin

    According to Don Pettit, we've lost the technology to go back to the moon. Maybe bc it was a Hollywood soundstage.

  137. Brad Wooldidge

    Brad Wooldidge2 kun oldin

    We didn’t actually “lose the technology”, lol. We lost the infrastructure. Since you’re a flattard, look up what that word means.

  138. Atlas

    Atlas2 kun oldin

    We literally did though

  139. Apocalips

    Apocalips4 kun oldin

    'According to Don Pettit, we've lost the technology to go back to the moon'. According to an idiot that means all the Apollo missions were a gigantic hoax....

  140. ronakb

    ronakb4 kun oldin

    okay so i dont get it if we had to simulate the moon's gravity why not try the free fall thing, just in a very controlled environment where to simulate the moon's gravity?

  141. yogi Halim

    yogi Halim4 kun oldin

    Mr. Wayne Ottiger I love that guy. I hope more people interviewed him, keep him company and leech off from his wonderful mind.

  142. evilsanta8585

    evilsanta85854 kun oldin

    Hold up are we being pulled down to the earth or is the earth pushing up against us? Honestly you should do a video on gravity, there are couple contradicting theories

  143. Michael Stoyles

    Michael Stoyles4 kun oldin

    Great we’re going back to the moon hopefully start making a lunar base, but it’s cool to think nowadays there are literally hundreds of space simulators, what would take a couple months of calculating some numbers would take mins now

  144. yogi Halim

    yogi Halim4 kun oldin

    are these now rendered obsolete by accelerometer and gyroscope like in a quadcopter drone?